Ram Prasad Wins The Greenhill Round Robin



Addison, TX–Congratulations to La Jolla’s Ram Prasad, who defeated Harrison’s Danny DeBois on a 2-1 decision (*Jared Woods, Jenn Melin, Chad Henson) to win this year’s edition of the Greenhill Round Robin! Ram is coached by Jeff Liu and Tom Evnen. Danny is coached by Chetan Hertzig and Henry Zhang.

The following was the field for the tournament, previously released by Aaron Timmons.

Compulsory
1. Harrison – Danny DeBois (13-1)
2. Westwood – Akhil Gandra (9-5)
Grapevine – Alexander Yoakum
Greenhill School – Mitali Mathur
Isidore Newman – Matthew Meyer
Northland Christian – Shania Hunt
The Harker School – Pranav Reddy
PV Peninsula – Arjun Tambe

Voting
1. La Jolla – Ram Prasad (12-2)
2. Palo Alto – Travis Chen (10-4)
Clements – Rebecca Gelfer
Greenhill School – Varad Agarwala
Harvard Westlake – Annie Kors
Lexington – Preetham Chippada
Northland Christian – Davis LaBarre
Hockaday School – Chloe Naguib

Speakers
1. Danny DeBois
2. Ram Prasad
3. Annie Kors

 

  • Guest

    dat picture

  • sjadler

    For what it’s worth, I agree, been traveling for the holiday but just saw this. Not sure why this was even the case to begin with (Greenhill doesn’t like pictures of them appearing on this site, but presumably that doesn’t mean they’re unnamed a la Voldemort).

  • Jacob Pritt

    who the FUCK let you post on this website?

  • Jacob Pritt

    I would like to formally and completely downvote Smitty’s awful comment. Get over yourself, dude. It’s a joke. Also, this is the type of person you’re being right now.

    • LD Advocate

      Jacob, why do you insist on persisting in this long narrative of absurd and obnoxious behavior? First you tried to go after AT, and were wrong. Then, you tried to go
      after Sherry, and were wrong. So what’s the logical next step? Start trying to
      tear down AT again. At least last time you pretended to be on the right side of
      the issue. This time, you’re just doing whatever it takes to sully AT’s good
      name. “Addison Round Robin,” really? Thank goodness someone on the NSD Team had the good sense (Mr. Adler, I assume) to take the post down. And your response to the one person who actually bit on your pathetic attempt to start a “substantive discussion”? Rudeness. Looking back, I can see why Sherry didn’t allow you to judge at the Harvard RR. Institutional liability is an
      understatement.What’s even more disturbing is the racial undertones of this conversation. Look at who you’re attacking – AT, Elijah, et al. In his article, Elijah refers to people like you as the problem. So either stop being a problem, or leave. I am sure other adults in this activity that are in good standing agree with me and will take action accordingly.

      Your Neighborhood Watchman,
      LD Advocate

      • GetRealNoobs

        To be honest, I don’t know Jacob very well. However, it has become apparent that whenever Greenhill debates or anything controversial happens they start making personal attacks towards their opponents. I saw this last year after ToC, when Jacob brought up the Bronx outround, etc. I just don’t understand why Greenhill has to always act morally sanctimonious towards everyone who just levies their opinion on this update. If they really feel like they are above the criticism, they should just not care.

        ~a third party observer

      • Jacob Pritt

        Yo, everyone. I’ve been away from this website for a while. I just wanna say a) I think it’s hilarious that so many of you idiots upvoted LD advocate, b) people don’t understand satire, and c) way too many illiterates attempt to read this website.

        Best,
        “Internet GangSTAR” Jacob Pritt

        • Paras Kumar

          regardless of its substantive merits, can we all at least agree that jacobs response to smitty was hilarious?

    • LD Advocate

      Jacob
      why do you insist on persisting in this long narrative of absurd and obnoxious
      behavior? First you tried to go after AT, and were wrong. Then, you tried to go
      after Sherry, and were wrong. So what’s the logical next step? Start trying to
      tear down AT again. At least last time you pretended to be on the right side of
      the issue. This time, you’re just doing whatever it takes to sully AT’s good
      name. “Addison Round Robin,” really? Thank goodness someone on the NSD Team had
      the good sense (Mr. Adler, I assume) to take the post down. And your response
      to the one person who actually bit on your pathetic attempt to start a
      “substantive discussion”? Rudeness. Looking back, I can see why Sherry didn’t
      allow you to judge at the Harvard RR. Institutional liability is an
      understatement.

      What’s
      even more disturbing is the racial undertones of this conversation. Look at who
      you’re attacking – AT, Elijah, et al. In his article, Elijah refers to people like
      you as the problem. So either stop being a problem, or leave. I am sure other
      adults in this activity that are in good standing agree with me and will take
      action accordingly.

  • mcgin029

    I am so confused.